Textbook of Obstetrics

In the preface to the First Edition of Williams' Obstetrics published in 1903 the author wrote these words: "I have attempted to set for-th as briefly as seemed to be consistent with thoroughness, the scientific basis for and the practical application of the obstetric art. . . I have endeavored to present the more practical aspects in such a manner as to be of direct service to the obstetrician at the bedside." It was with the publication of this work that J. Whitridge Williams established a tradition in obstetrical text that has remained unsurpassed through eight editions, six revised by himself and two by Henricus J. Stander. Dr. Stander has this to say about the present volume: "This edition represents the Ninth Edition of Williams' Obstetrics but as it embodies the teaching and practice of the present author he should assume full responsibility and thus this change in title is indicated." To those who have been nurtured on Williams' Obstetrics the Stander textbook will not be disappointing, for the excellence of the former shows distinct preservation in the latter. Also, like its predecessor, this present edition will take its rightful place as a standard text for medical students and nurses. As in previous editions the excellent bibliography brings up to date a comprehensive list of the important contributions to obstetrics. While in a review of this limitation it is not feasible to particulari7e in criticism of the many subjects treated in so extensive a work, nevertheless certain portions are of special interest to this reviewer; namely, those having to do with the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic dystocia. The chapters on clinical and roentgen pelvimetry treat this subject better than has been seen in any recent text. If criticism is to be offered concerning the treatment of pelvic contraction, it would be that symphysiotomy and pubiotomy are today only of historical interest and the description of the latter operation may be misleading in its evaluation, even though the author does express his doubt that there is any sound indication for its performance. The intent of Dr. Williams, as seen in the preface to his first edition, finds notable and enduring expression in this new text by Dr. Stander. HERBERT THOMS.